I have so far remained pretty silent on
the subject of e-cigarettes on both this blog, and the internet in
general. Mostly because when I was using them, I didn't want to get
into an argument about it, and since I have stopped using them, I
have not really given them as much thought, and I still don't want to
get into an argument about it either. Let it be said though, that
without them I would almost certainly still be smoking twenty odd
cigarettes a day (more at weekends) rather than occasionally blagging
one when I am proper drunk. I am now a non-smoker, and without the
electric fags, I would never have managed to quit. So they are good
ok? That's my current position.
To briefly outline my story here, after
turning 35, I had the chance to buy a house, and realised that my
life was actually quite good, I was very happy with my wife, stepkids
and menagerie of animals and prolonging my existence seemed a good
idea. At which point I decided my original pension plan of drinking
and smoking myself into an early grave was possibly a bit dumb, and
began the process of trying to be a bit healthy. So as a smoker of
some 20-something years standing, I thought I'd give the electric
ones a try, as they were clearly going to be better for me than the
real ones. I did, and they worked, I even preferred them to the real
ones after a week or so, and stopped smoking proper fags entirely.
With no willpower required, and no crazy mood swings and nicotine
withdrawal symptoms. Also, I didn't have to go outside the pub
anymore, so all was good. I had not given up smoking, but I had found
a less deadly substitute for my addiction.
I carried on vaping (as they call it)
for the next year and a bit, all the time being aware that I now had
even more crap in my pockets than I had when I smoked, and half my
reasoning behind wanting to give up was to have less crap in my
pockets. Eventually, the irritating, dumb looking, leaky things that
need constant charging and maintenance did my head in, and I thought
I'd see how long I could go without taking a hit off one each day. It
turned out that it was incredibly easy to not bother by this point,
so I stopped. Just like that, back in march. Result. I do
occasionally nick a real cigarette off somebody, or have a sneaky
drag, but the odd smoke every now and then is not going to do anybody
any harm is it? Well, certainly not add any new damage to that
already inflicted by the aforementioned 20 odd years of 20 odd a day.
Having tried to give up the old
fashioned way before, I was surprised how simple it was this time. A
few years ago I cut down and stopped entirely, lasting for about 4
months of abject misery and mood swings before deciding to start
smoking again anyway. So I am all in favour of the little shiny
electrical vapourisers, and am sick of the awful smearing of them
going on at the moment.
Let me counter the usual and obvious
arguments I hear from reluctant smokers and crazy anti-everything
types here.
1 – We just don't know what's in
them.
Not true, they contain, propylene
glycol, vegetable glycol, nicotine, and various flavourings, like you
get in smoke machines, asthma inhalers, tomatoes, and cake. These are
vaporised by the use of kanthal wires wrapped around silica wicks
inside glass or plastic cylinders. We know exactly what is in them.
2- We don't know what the long term
effects are yet
True, but on the other hand, we do know
what the long term effects of cigarette smoking are. Being dead from
lung cancer, heart disease or some other marvellously unpleasant
smoking related illness. I think I'd rather take a punt on the
unknown (up to a point, we know the effects of all the ingredients,
just not what happens when inhaled regularly for a long period of
time all together).
3 – It's not 100% safe
No, but then again, see above for the
alternative for most people. It is categorically, definitely and very
much proven to be a good deal safer than smoking cigarettes will ever
be, so hoorah! A real alternative for long term nicotine addicts who
don't want to give up really, but don't fancy the painful death.
Nobody is claiming that they are worse than actual cigarettes,
really, nobody.
4 – Kids and pets have died from
drinking the liquid.
Not quite, there has apparently been
just one death from liquid nicotine, in 2011, a suicide utilising
injections. Also, it is sold in bottles with big orange warning
labels, like bleach. Kids and pets have died from drinking that as
well, but nobody's going to ban bleach. Keep your stuff away from
kids and pets, they'll be fine, it's not for drinking.
Have a look at this for other
comparative poisonings that weren't in the mainstream media.
Of course the utterly insane anti
brigade are also claiming them to be a gateway to actual smoking, and
that they normalise the act of smoking. This is proper nuts. Do
diabetics normalise heroine addiction? Does drinking a whole pint of
water in one go when you're thirsty normalise alcoholism/ binge
drinking? No, of course not, and as to the idea that more kids will
take up smoking in either form because of e-cigarettes, I put it to
you that they are probably the same kids that would have taken up
proper cigarettes anyway. I don't know any people of my generation
that have never smoked, and I doubt it's changed much in the last
twenty odd years either. Kids like to try stuff and push at the
boundaries, 90% of people my age gave up when they left uni and got
proper jobs. That probably won't change either. Don't check that
statistic by the way, I just pulled it out of thin air and it is
probably not accurate. The scare tactics are much the same as way
back when dope was being called a gateway drug and everyone who
smoked it would end up Oding on heroin. It is remarkable how many
dope smokers I know who have never even tried the stuff, let alone
shot it into their eyeballs with a cow insemination needle. See this
yougov survey for actual figures and stuff
http://yougov.co.uk/news/2014/04/28/e-cigarettes-not-gateway-smoking/
it is baseless nonsense being put about by people who should know
better.
The big problem here is still that much
smeared and maligned thing, nicotine. Now yes, nicotine is a poison,
but it is about as poisonous as caffeine, and nobody is screaming
that we should ban coffee. The problem is that the original
anti-smoking campaigns that we all grew up with at school used
nicotine as the bad guy in tobacco products. Probably because he is
easier to anthropormorphise than Carbon monoxide, benzene and
cyanide. Nick O'Teen was a marvellous villain, and plants the seed
that nicotine is the most dangerous part of the smoking experience. I
reckon Ben Zeen might have been better, but less obvious. Nicotine is
the addictive bit, but not the killer, otherwise the gums and sprays
and patches would be less easily endorsed.
Now as to why the poor things are being
smeared, I have no idea, the conspiracy theorists out there will tell
you it is the big tobacco companies and big pharma companies worrying
about lost income from smokers shifting to ecigs instead of buying
the usual ineffective alternatives. It certainly sounds logical, but
it is surprising how many otherwise sane and rational people are
spouting the “normalising smoking” and “but they could be worse
for you” lines.
To my mind, anything that saves lives,
and moves people away from actual cigarettes is a good thing, and not
to be sniffed at. Don't listen to the naysayers, these are good
things, don't keep banning them in public, there is absolutely no
danger from passive inhalation, it is water vapour, are you scared
of passive fumes from your kettle? This constant banning of
everything is a symptom of a society with no free choices, and makes
me worry that free will is being eroded. I like to think I chose to
give up smoking, but I suspect I am also a victim of the demonisation
of a once acceptable habit. Though being conditioned not to slowly
kill myself is not a bad thing, after all those years of being
conditioned to think it was cool and brilliant by big tobacco
companies and movies and rock and roll.
“It
is very important to understand that any effort made to free oneself
from one's conditioning is another form of conditioning.” - J.
Krishnamurti
Great piece. Thank you for the information and sharing your personal experiences. I'd not thought about ecigs until now. Glad they helped. I did cold turkey and grumpy method back in the day.
ReplyDeleteThanks Steve, cold turkey and grumpy is difficult, like surgery without anesthesia, it belongs to the past.
DeleteToo right. Had there been ecigs 'in my day' I'd have been on them. Gee I smoked anything back in those days! And no, pot never led me to harder drugs - it was just fine on it's own thank you!
DeleteAlso, I always related more to, and felt sorry for, Nick O'Teen. To me he represented the kid (me) being bullied by the big, Mr Popular, Sporty, Good at Everything, Bully, Superman. The type of superkid who would punch me below the ribs as we walked through a doorway laughing to his mates or give me a wedgy whilst walking down the stairs laughing to his mates. And whilst we're on the subject, the "This is your brain on drugs" posters of the 80's always made me wonder what it would feel like to have a pair of fried eggs as a brain...I simply had to find out! And, Danny Kendall - he was a hero of mine... Talk about getting drug education completely wrong for an entire generation! But I digress
I like my fried egg brain, and I blame Zammo for everything I did in the 90s. The just say no song spurred me on to just say yes. And then later, to just say, well alright then, maybe, and eventually to say, you know what? I've had enough now, I think I'll stop. Though if I hear it again now, i might go back on the good shit, just to spite them.
Delete